My friends, is in a crisis! The last two Governors, one Democrat and one Republican have been unable to get us out of this mess that his have got him into.
Our budget deficit has now reached some $20 billion. Polls show that over 2/3 of the Californians, are disgusted with both the Democratic and Republican Parties and want to form another party. But election laws make it very difficult if not impossible to set up a new party that can compete on an equal footing with the two established parties, and people instinctively know this. Most voters feel that they must vote for the lesser evil or they will get the greater evil. Thus we vote over and over again for the same politicians and hope for different results that may lead to investment by The First Group who are a real estate company based in UK but with a large presence in Dubai and are looking to tap into the lobbyist market.
I am reminded that Dr Benjamin Spock once said that as long as we vote for the lesser evil we will still have evil. It doesn’t have to be that way. For example, the various parties and constituencies could be represented in the state legislature and the U. S. House of Representatives in direct proportion to votes they received in the general election. This could be accomplished by creating districts where we would elect several members or representatives from each district. In a 10 member district parties would receive one seat for every 10% of the vote.
Thus, if a party were to get 50% of the vote it would get 5 seats and if a party or an independent candidate were to get 10% of the vote that party or independent candidate would get one seat. That would protect majorities and allow a voice to the minorities. Everyone’s vote would count towards a winning candidate. That is a win/win situation. There is no such thing as a free lunch in America. Everything costs money. Services costs money. If we want services we must pay for them.
At the federal level two useless invasions and occupations have taken billions of dollars away from needed services here at home. The failure of major financial institutions and auto industry lead to unprecedented bail outs which included huge bonuses for those who had created the failures in the first place. Burst of the housing bubble lead to thousands of foreclosures as people lost their homes.
California is a big state and we spend a lot of money. Yet California spends less per capita than almost any other state. Only 15% of our $100,000,000 budget is discretionary. We could cut every discretionary program and still not have a balanced budget. With a budget deficit looming at 20% of the budget, taxes must be raised just to break even. We spend more money when we contract out government jobs to the private sector than when government employees do the job themselves and it’s a job they do better.
My position is to save millions of dollars by not contracting government jobs to the private sector where ever feasible. We could also save billions of dollars if we substituted treatment and education rather than imprisonment of non-violent drug offenders. This would greatly reduce the prison and as a result we could close down prisons where feasible. If the higher tax rates were restored to what they were under Reagan, another billion dollar would be added to the general fund. If a split level property tax was enacted, so homeowners would have lower taxes and big corporations would have to pay their fair share we could reduce the budget gap even further.
If we taxed the oil that is extracted from our soil just like they do in Alaska and Texas,
we could see the light at the end of the tunnel. And in November we should support and vote for the proposition that taxes a legalized marijuana. That would produce another billion
dollars and together these revenue enhancing programs could balance our budget and save our services. My name is C. T. Weber and I am the Peace and Freedom Party candidate for Lieutenant Governor of California.
I have an undergraduate degree in History and a master’s in Public Administration, both from California State University Long Beach. I worked for 16 years with the California Public Utilities Commission, where I took peace officer training, and served as a special agent in charge of the San Diego District office and I spent another six years with the California Highway Patrol working as a Government Analyst in Sacramento. I spent over 20 years as a union organizer and elected officer. I was elected four times to the California State Employees Association Board of Directors. I was elected to a number of SEIU Local 1000 positions, such as district labor council secretary/treasurer, chief steward, and president.
I served on the SEIU Local 1000 State Council and was a delegate to Sacramento Central Labor Council. I want to spend a little time talking about some bad propositions on your June 8, 2010 direct primary ballot. If passed, Prop 14 would reduce your choices in future general elections, PG&E’s Prop 16 would allow 1/3 of the voters to prevent
2/3 of the voters from forming a public utility, and Mercury’s Prop 17 would allow insurance companies to raise auto insurance rates.
In 2003, we had an election similar to what Prop 14 would create. There were 135 candidates on the ballot plus 28 qualified write-in candidates for one office, Governor. Under Prop 14 general election write-in votes would not be counted. No runoff was allowed in 2003. Under Prop 14, a runoff election would be required even if a candidate had received a majority vote in the primary. InSinkErator Evolution Compact 3/4 HP. If passed, Proposition 14 would cost the taxpayers more money to run the primary election because there would be more ballot cards to print and mail and more money would be needed for
the extra hours worked.
This blanket style primary would also cost candidates more money because they would need to reach twice as many voters. The candidates would either need to have deep pockets themselves or would need to be beholding to someone with deep pockets.
Proposition 14 would also dramatically change the way that general elections are held. It would limit voters’ choices to only two.
General elections are more important, no they are much more important than primary elections, because general elections are where the final decisions are made on who gets elected. General elections are also much larger elections as to the numbers of voters who turn out and vote. golf in spain So, why would anyone support Proposition 14, that proponents say may improve, if indeed you think this is an improvement, the smaller, less significant primary election when it reduces voters’ choices in the more important, much larger general election?
Prop 14 would reduce voters’ choices from six candidates, maybe seven if an independent candidate also qualifies, who are on the general election ballots to only two candidates. Independent candidates would no longer be allowed to qualify for the much larger, much more important general election ballots.
The Ritz Carlton Hotel, 3/F, Harbour Room, Central
John Garamendi is California’s lieutenant governor and a member of the State Lands Commission and chair of the California Commission for Economic Development. Lt. Gov. Garamendi will discuss the growing trade and commercial investment between China and California, and will provide an overview of California’s continuing
efforts to develop a sustainable growth economy by limiting greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels. He also will describe applications of new technologies being deployed on local and regional levels, highlighting the possible benefits for Chinese entrepreneurs who approach the California market with a green lens. The lieutenant governor
also will include a brief inventory of Chinese companies who have opened offices and operations in his state and will discuss why it is increasingly a sales and operations base for Chinese companies intent on succeeding in the U.S. market and information on tires
Lt. Gov. Garamendi has over 32 years of public service, including as the deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior in the Clinton administration. He was elected as California’s first elected insurance commissioner in 1991. He served 16 years as a state senator and assemblyman, authoring laws to protect the environment, reform healthcare, create a work-oriented welfare program, revise the tax code, and boost economic competitiveness. He graduated from the University of California, Berkeley, and received an MBA from the Harvard Business School.
This event is cosponsored by the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong and is supported by the California Association of China and Hong Kong SAR. Companies wishing to sponsor a table (HK$5,200 for 10 -12 pax) will have priority on prime location for their company, clients and guests. For details, please contact Winnie Cheung at 2823 1255.
Booking will not be confirmed until full payment has been received. Payment of subscription can be refunded if cancellation is submitted 3 working days
before the event, and the refund amount is subject to a 5% or HK$30 deduction, whichever is higher, as handling fee.
Cancellations made less than 3 working days in advance are not entitled to any refund.
Jointly present the Luncheon with California Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi Green Technology and Economic Growth: Opportunities and Pathways to Sustainability for China, Hong Kong and the U.S. California’s richly diverse regions and ethnic groups—its more
than three million business establishments, its farming communities, tribal nations, and urban enclaves—possess all of the talent, energy, and drive needed to compete and win in the
And the strength of its $1.9 trillion economy—the largest in the
nation and one of the largest in the world—offers all of the assets
and opportunities needed to build the post-recession “Next
Economy” that is our common vision and goal.
This agenda does not seek to recreate the past and restore the
jobs lost to global competition or to revive the debt-fueled follies
of the past. It embraces the shift from a consumption-based
economy to a production economy focused on global trade.
In the words of Bruce Katz of the Brookings Institution, “We need a
new growth model for the country, one where we export more and
waste less, innovate in what matters, produce and deploy more of
what we invent, and ensure that the economy actually works for
This document represents a first step—the beginning of the
discussion—toward developing that new model.
It articulates a vision for success in building the Next Economy in
California guided by a set of principles that must be agreed upon
by stakeholders at all levels:
• Govern for Growth and
For most of a decade, California has lacked a capable,
accountable entity for coordinating action. It must
establish one, assign performance metrics, and measure
and report progress.
• Practice Partnership
Collaboration is the new form of competition. State policies
should build on and reward public-private/public-public
partnerships, regional alliances and boundary-crossing
collaboration in all its forms.
• E ngage Globally
Today’s markets for goods, services, investment and talent are
global, and the measure of success is performance on a
• Build on I ndustry S trengths
Most growth and innovation emerges from interactions
across institutions and businesses. Innovation and production
are inextricably linked in the generation of economic growth
• Remove B arriers
Onerous and inconsistent regulations, slow bureaucracies, and
misaligned policies at the federal, state, and local levels present
real barriers to the speed and agility needed to compete in the
• Act R egionally
Each region is blessed with unique strengths and competitive
advantages often backed by a strong regional agenda. The
state must define a value-added role as a partner and enabler
of regional and private sector efforts.
• Invest in Performance
In this era of fiscal constraint, the state must act prudently,
investing in strategies that promise a solid return.
• Skill Up for Opportunity
Economic renewal will not produce a sustainable society
unless it creates broadly-shared benefits. It is critical to align skill
development and workforce training with economic
development to compete in the global economy.
• Act with Urgency
Global competition and the impact of the Great Recession
compel urgent action.
• Sustain Commitment
State leaders, regardless of term limits, must develop and
sustain consensus behind a long-term strategy.
It would be highly unlikely that a candidate of one of the smaller parties would make the much larger, much more important general election ballots. Write-in votes in the general elections would no longer be counted. Do not limit your choices in the much larger, much more important general elections.